Prevalence of Detectable Biotin in Five US Emergency Department Patient Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of biotin supplementation in United States emergency department patients using a multi-site, geographically distributed sampling model. METHODS: Biotin was measured using an Abbott ARCHITECT Biotin research use only assay in 7118 emergency department patient serum or plasma samples from five US medical centers. Samples with biotin ≥10 ng/mL underwent additional LC-MS/MS confirmatory testing for biotin and its primary metabolites. The overall and site-specific prevalence of detectable biotin was determined using the screening assay while biotin speciation (i.e., prevalence of detectable metabolites) was determined using LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Of 7118 samples screened, 291 (4.1%) had biotin ≥10 ng/mL and were considered positive. Across five medical centers, the fraction of positive samples ranged from 2.0% to 5.4%. The maximum biotin concentration observed was 355 ng/mL. Of the 285 positive screens that underwent additional LC-MS/MS testing, 89 (31%) showed detectable biotin, bisnorbiotin, and/or biotin sulfoxide. Biotin, bisnorbiotin, and biotinsulfoxide were detected in 82/89 (92.1%), 61/89 (68.5%), and 18/89 (20.2%) samples, respectively; biotin was detected in the absence of either metabolite in 18/89 (20.2%) samples. CONCLUSIONS: Using a screening assay, 4.1% of emergency department patient samples were found to be potentially susceptible to interference from biotin. Confirmatory testing showed detectable biotin and/or biotin metabolites in 31% of positive screens (1.3% overall). The prevalence of biotin ≥10 ng/mL varied 2-3-fold across US emergency department patient cohorts. Biotin metabolites were observed in 80% of samples confirmed to have detectable biotin species by LC-MS/MS, suggesting that rigorous assessments of assay susceptibility to biotin interference, often performed using in vitro studies, should consider the potential role of biotin metabolites present in vivo.

Evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT Toxo IgM assay.

Development of the ARCHITECT Toxo IgM assay has been done to assist the clinician in acute Toxoplasma gondii infection detection, especially in pregnant women. Its use, in conjunction with ARCHITECT Toxo IgG and Toxo Avidity assays, will provide an array of assays particularly useful in the monitoring of pregnant females to determine the risk of maternal transmission of the parasite. Specificity results from 2 testing sites, using populations of pregnant females, hospital patients, and blood donors, demonstrated that the assay has an overall resolved relative specificity of 99.89% (confidence interval, 99.68-99.98%). Relative specificity for pregnant female specimens was 99.95% (n = 2031). Excellent seroconversion sensitivity was observed for the ARCHITECT Toxo IgM assay, which was similar to the Abbott AxSYM Toxo IgM assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). In more than 90% of the panels tested, the 1st bleed detected in the serial bleeds was the same for both assays.

Effect of collection tube type and preanalytical handling on myeloperoxidase concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) has shown potential as a marker for cardiovascular disease. Limited studies have been published with a variety of sample types, resulting in a wide range of MPO values. Little is known or understood about the impact of collection tube type and preanalytical handling of specimens for MPO determination. METHOD: MPO concentration was determined by use of the ARCHITECT(R) MPO research use assay, which is currently under development. Samples were collected into multiple anticoagulant collection tubes from donors and patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms of acute coronary syndromes. Whole blood was stored on ice or at room temperature for predetermined time periods. We also evaluated serum and plasma after centrifugation followed by storage at room temperature, 2-8 degrees C, and below -10 degrees C. RESULTS: Baseline sample concentrations were dependent on collection tube type as well as handling conditions. MPO concentrations were consistently higher in samples collected in serum and heparin plasma tubes than in samples in EDTA or citrate tubes. Spike recovery was acceptable in all sera and plasma tested, indicating that the increased MPO concentrations were not due directly to an anticoagulant interference. CONCLUSIONS: The collection tube type and preanalytical handling are critical for accurate and consistent MPO measurement. The preferred anticoagulant and tubes are the EDTA or EDTA plasma preparation tube. MPO concentrations in samples collected in these tubes are stable before centrifugation as whole blood as well as plasma after processing.